Map your network.
Activate it.

I'm going to use you to map and activate my professional network. First, let me tell you what I'm trying to accomplish: [Write 2–3 sentences: What's your goal right now? Examples: "I'm looking to transition into product management and want to find people who can refer me or give me honest advice." "I'm building a startup and looking for potential co-founders, advisors, and early customers." "I want to build a personal board of advisors — people who will push me, open doors, and help me think through big decisions."] Now here are my top contacts from memory: Name | Company | Title | How I know them [Type your 20–30 contacts here] Confirm you have my goals and contacts, and tell me how many contacts you can see.

Based on my goals and the contacts you can see, pull the 15–20 people in my network most relevant to what I'm trying to accomplish. For each, tell me: - Name | Company | Title - Why they're relevant to my goal (one sentence — be specific, not generic) - What you know or can infer about them from the data Don't sort by tier yet. Just surface the most relevant people first.

Now let's score each contact you surfaced. We're building a composite score across 5 dimensions. You score these three from the data: 1. RELEVANCE (1–5): How directly does this person connect to my stated goal? 5 = directly in the role, company, industry, or function I'm targeting 3 = adjacent — related field, transferable context 1 = tangential or unclear connection to my goal 2. INFLUENCE (1–5): How much pull do they have? 5 = senior decision-maker, partner, founder, C-suite, or known name in the space 3 = mid-level, manager, or respected practitioner 1 = early career or unclear seniority 3. NETWORK MULTIPLIER (1–5): How likely are they to know many of the right people? 5 = works at a hub company (top VC, consulting firm, major tech co, top school) or has a large/active presence 3 = solid network, mid-size company or specialized firm 1 = likely a smaller or more isolated network I'll answer these two: 4. RELATIONSHIP WARMTH (1–5): How warm is this relationship really? 5 = we've worked closely, I could message them today with no awkwardness 3 = we've met or worked together once, haven't spoken recently 1 = we connected but barely know each other 5. RECIPROCITY (1–5): Have I invested in this relationship? 5 = I've helped them, referred them, stayed in touch, or supported their work 3 = mutual but light — we've exchanged pleasantries or liked each other's posts 1 = I've taken more than I've given, or we've never really engaged For each contact, give me your scores on dimensions 1–3, then ask me for my scores on 4–5. Then calculate a COMPOSITE SCORE (average of all 5) and a PRIORITY TIER: Tier 1 (4.0–5.0): Activate now Tier 2 (2.5–3.9): Warm up first Tier 3 (1.0–2.4): Nurture via content Final output — table: Name | Relevance | Influence | Multiplier | Warmth | Reciprocity | Composite | Tier | Suggested approach

I'm using this network for a career transition or job search. From my Tier 1 and high-composite Tier 2 contacts, identify: - Who scores highest on RELEVANCE to my target role or industry - Who scores highest on INFLUENCE — most likely to know of openings or make a credible referral - Who scores highest on NETWORK MULTIPLIER — most likely to connect me to people I don't know yet Flag if any contact scores high on influence but low on warmth — these need a warm-up move before a direct ask. Flag if any contact scores high on warmth but low on relevance — these might be better for moral support or general advice than targeted introductions. For the top 5, write a short, specific outreach message: - 3–4 sentences max - No "I hope this finds you well" - Reference something real about them or our history - Soft CTA: not "can we hop on a call" — more like "would love to hear what you're seeing in [space] these days" - Adjust tone based on warmth score: warmer = more casual and direct; lower warmth = slightly more context-setting first Format: Name | Composite Score | Message

Based on my network composition, scoring data, and career goal, what should I be posting on LinkedIn? Look at the industries, seniority levels, and functions of my high-scoring contacts and tell me: 1. The top 3 topics that will resonate with this specific audience AND signal my direction credibly — specific, not generic (not "career change" — something like "what I'm learning moving from ops to product") 2. What content format works best for this network given their seniority and function mix (personal story / tactical how-to / contrarian take / in-progress learning) 3. What tone positions me well given who's in my Tier 1 (peer learning out loud / confident practitioner transitioning / domain expert applying skills somewhere new) 4. Which specific contacts are most likely to engage with or amplify my content based on their role and industry — tag these as "content allies" 5. Three specific opening lines I could post this week — just the hook Base this entirely on my scoring data and network composition, not generic LinkedIn advice.

I'm using this network to build my startup. I need co-founders, advisors, early customers, and investors. From my scored contacts, run four separate analyses: CO-FOUNDERS: High relevance + high influence + high warmth. Complementary skill set to mine. Have they built something before? Do they have entrepreneurial signals in their title or company history? ADVISORS: High influence + high network multiplier. Deep domain expertise. Senior enough to be credible but not so senior they're inaccessible. Flag anyone who's advised startups before (look for advisor/board roles in title). EARLY CUSTOMERS: High relevance to the problem I'm solving. Their role or industry suggests they'd feel the pain my product addresses. Warmth matters here — cold sales is hard, warm intros are gold. INVESTORS: Anyone in VC, angel investing, or who has "invested in" signals in their profile. Also flag founders who've exited — they often angel invest. Score these high on network multiplier regardless of warmth. For the top 2 in each category, write a specific outreach message: - 3–4 sentences - Lead with something real and specific - One sentence on what you're building - Concrete low-friction ask ("would love to show you what we're building and get your reaction") - Calibrate based on warmth score Format: Category | Name | Composite Score | Message

Based on my network scoring and founder goal, what should I be posting on LinkedIn to attract co-founders, advisors, customers, and investors? Look at the composition of my high-scoring contacts — their industries, seniority, and functions — and tell me: 1. The top 3 topics that will resonate with this specific audience AND signal that I'm building something real and worth paying attention to — specific (not "entrepreneurship," something like "the problem I kept hitting at [company] that nobody was solving") 2. What content format builds founder credibility with this particular network (building in public / domain insight / contrarian market take / customer problem storytelling) 3. What tone works given who's in my Tier 1 (early builder sharing the journey / confident founder with conviction / domain expert who spotted a gap) 4. Which contacts are most likely to share or amplify founder content — these are your distribution allies, flag them 5. Three specific opening lines I could post this week Base this on my network scoring data and goals, not generic advice.

I want to use this network to build a personal board of advisors — a small group of people who can give me honest perspective, open doors, and help me think through big decisions over time. From my scored contacts, identify candidates across four advisor archetypes: THE DOMAIN EXPERT: High relevance + high influence. Deep expertise in the field I'm working in or moving toward. Their advice is credible because they've done the thing. THE CONNECTOR: High network multiplier. May not be the most senior person, but knows everyone and makes introductions freely. Their value is access. THE HONEST CHALLENGER: High warmth + high reciprocity. Someone who knows me well enough to tell me when I'm wrong. Not just a cheerleader. THE SPONSOR: High influence + high warmth. Senior enough to advocate for me in rooms I'm not in. Different from a mentor — they don't just advise, they vouch. For each archetype, identify the top 1–2 candidates from my network. Then for each, write a short outreach message: - 3–4 sentences - Don't ask them to "be your advisor" — too formal and transactional - Make a specific ask that starts the relationship: "I've been thinking about X and your perspective would be invaluable — would you have 20 minutes sometime?" - Calibrate warmth: high warmth = casual and direct; lower warmth = a little more context first Format: Archetype | Name | Composite Score | Message

Based on my network scoring and my goal of building a personal board of advisors, what should I be posting on LinkedIn to attract the right people into my orbit — and stay visible to the ones already in my network? Look at the seniority, influence, and function of my high-scoring contacts and tell me: 1. The top 3 topics that will resonate with senior, high-influence contacts and signal that I'm someone worth advising — specific (not "professional growth," something like "a decision I got wrong and what I learned from it") 2. What content format earns credibility with this audience (thoughtful reflection / domain insight / honest lessons learned / questions I'm genuinely sitting with) 3. What tone attracts advisors rather than peers (coachable and self-aware / intellectually serious / someone with clear direction who still asks good questions) 4. Which specific contacts in my high-scoring list are most likely to engage with this type of content — these are the people to activate first before making a direct ask 5. Three specific opening lines I could post this week Base this on my network data and scoring, not generic advice.